Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Research Articles

Germline cis variant determines epigenetic regulation of the anti-cancer drug metabolism gene dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD)

Enhancers are critical for regulating tissue-specific gene expression, and genetic variants within enhancer regions have been suggested to contribute to various cancer-related processes, including therapeutic resistance. However, the precise mechanisms remain elusive. Using a well-defined drug-gene pair, we identified an enhancer region for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, DPYD gene) expression that is relevant to the metabolism of the anti-cancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Using reporter systems, CRISPR genome-edited cell models, and human liver specimens, we demonstrated in vitro and vivo that genotype status for the common germline variant (rs4294451; 27% global minor allele frequency) located within this novel enhancer controls DPYD transcription and alters resistance to 5-FU. The variant genotype increases recruitment of the transcription factor CEBPB to the enhancer and alters the level of direct interactions between the enhancer and DPYD promoter. Our data provide insight into the regulatory mechanisms controlling sensitivity and resistance to 5-FU.

Germline cis variant determines epigenetic regulation of the anti-cancer drug metabolism gene dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD).

Enhancers are critical for regulating tissue-specific gene expression, and genetic variants within enhancer regions have been suggested to contribute to various cancer-related processes, including therapeutic resistance. However, the precise mechanisms remain elusive. Using a well-defined drug-gene pair, we identified an enhancer region for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, DPYD gene) expression that is relevant to the metabolism of the anti-cancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Using reporter systems, CRISPR genome-edited cell models, and human liver specimens, we demonstrated in vitro and vivo that genotype status for the common germline variant (rs4294451; 27% global minor allele frequency) located within this novel enhancer controls DPYD transcription and alters resistance to 5-FU. The variant genotype increases recruitment of the transcription factor CEBPB to the enhancer and alters the level of direct interactions between the enhancer and DPYD promoter. Our data provide insight into the regulatory mechanisms controlling sensitivity and resistance to 5-FU.

Exploring the impact of MiR-92a-3p on FOLFOX chemoresistance biomarker genes in colon cancer cell lines.

Introduction: One of the primary obstacles faced by individuals with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is the potential development of acquired chemoresistance as the disease advances. Studies have indicated a direct association between elevated levels of miR-92a-3p and the progression, metastasis, and chemoresistance observed in CRC. We proposed that miR-92a-3p impairs FOLFOX (fluorouracil/oxaliplatin) chemotherapy response by upregulating the expression of chemoresistance biomarker genes through the activation of β-catenin and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). These FOLFOX biomarker genes include the pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway genes dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), thymidylate synthase (TYMS), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), and the genes encoding the DNA repair complexes subunits ERCC1 and ERCC2, and XRCC1. Methods: To assess this, we transfected SW480 and SW620 colon cancer cell lines with miR-92a-3p mimics and then quantified the expression of DPYD, TYMS, MTHFR, ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC1, the expression of EMT markers and transcription factors, and activation of β-catenin. Results and discussion: Our results reveal that miR-92a-3p does not affect the expression of DPYD, TYMS, MTHFR, and ERCC1. Furthermore, even though miR-92a-3p affects ERCC2, XRCC1, E-cadherin, and β-catenin mRNA levels, it has no influence on their protein expression. Conclusion: We found that miR-92a-3p does not upregulate the expression of proteins of DNA-repair pathways and other genes involved in FOLFOX chemotherapy resistance.

Fluoropyrimidine Toxicity: the Hidden Secrets of DPYD.

Fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity is a main limitation of therapy. Currently, polymorphisms in the DPYD gene, which encodes the 5-FU activation enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), are used to adjust the dosage and prevent toxicity. Despite the predictive value of DPYD genotyping, a great proportion of fluoropyrimidine toxicity cannot be solely explained by DPYD variations. We herein summarize additional sources of DPD enzyme activity variability, spanning from epigenetic regulation of DPYD expression, factors potentially inducing protein modifications, as well as drug-enzyme interactions that contribute to fluoropyrimidine toxicity. While seminal in vitro studies provided evidence that DPYD promoter methylation downregulates DPD expression, the association of DPYD methylation with fluoropyrimidine toxicity was not replicated in clinical studies. Different non-coding RNA molecules, such as microRNA, piwi-RNAs, circular-RNAs and long non-coding RNAs, are involved in post-transcriptional DPYD regulation. DPD protein modifications and environmental factors affecting enzyme activity may also add a proportion to the pooled variability of DPD enzyme activity. Lastly, DPD-drug interactions are common in therapeutics, with the most well-characterized paradigm the withdrawal of sorivudine due to fluoropyrimidine toxicity deaths in 5-FU treated cancer patients; a mechanism involving DPD severe inhibition. DPYD polymorphisms are the main source of DPD variability. A study on DPYD epigenetics (both transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally) holds promise to provide insights into molecular pathways of fluoropyrimidine toxicity. Additional post-translational DPD modifications, as well as DPD inhibition by other drugs, may explain a proportion of enzyme activity variability. Therefore, there is still a lot we can learn about the DPYD/DPD fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity machinery.

Genetic Variation in miR-27a Is Associated with Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Toxicity in Patients with Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Variants after Genotype-Guided Dose Reduction.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) is the rate-limiting enzyme involved in the metabolism of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in DPYD only partially explain fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity. The expression of DPYD has previously been shown to be regulated by microRNA-27a (miR-27a) and a common miR-27a SNV (rs895819) has been associated with an increased risk of toxicity in patients harboring a DPYD variant who received standard fluoropyrimidine dosing. We investigated if the miR-27a rs895819 SNV was associated with toxicity in DPYD wildtype patients and carriers of DPYD variants who received a reduced dose. The regulation of DPYD using miR-27a was investigated in HepG2 cells utilizing a miR-27a mimic. miR-27a overexpression decreased DPYD mRNA expression compared to control cells (p < 0.0001). In a cohort of patients that received pre-emptive DPYD genotyping, 45 patients had a DPYD variant and 180 were wildtype. Patients heterozygous for rs895819 had an increased risk of toxicity, which was seen in both patients who were wildtype for DPYD variants (OR (95%CI) = 1.99 (1.00-3.99)) and DPYD variant carriers (OR (95%CI) = 8.10 (1.16-86.21)). Therefore, miR-27a rs895819 may be a clinically relevant predictor of fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicities. Furthermore, toxicity was more profound in DPYD variant carriers, even after DPYD genotype-guided dose reduction. This suggests that patients may benefit from miR-27a genotyping to guide fluoropyrimidine dosing.

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) as a Bridge between the Immune Microenvironment of Colon Cancers and 5-FU Resistance.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of the 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance-related factor dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in tumor immunity and prognosis and to study the relationship between drug resistance and the immune microenvironment of colon cancer. Bioinformatics methods were used to analyze the expression of DPD associated with prognosis, immunity, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden in colon cancer. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to detect DPD, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in 219 colon cancer tissue samples. Additional IHC analyses were conducted to detect CD4, CD8, CD20, and CD163 in 30 colon cancer tissue samples with the most extensive immune infiltration. The significance of the correlations and clinical significance of DPD with immune infiltration, immune-related markers, microsatellite instability-related indicators, and prognosis were evaluated. The major findings of the present study are as follows: (1) DPD was expressed in tumor and immune cells and associated with certain immune cell-related markers, particularly M2 macrophages that expressed CD163. (2) DPD expression significantly and positively correlated with immune cell markers and immune checkpoints PD-1 and PD-L1. High expression of DPD in immune cells, but not tumor cells, led to increased immune infiltration. (3) High expression of DPD in immune and tumor cells induced 5-FU resistance and was associated with unfavorable prognosis. (4) DPD expression closely correlated with microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden and led to resistance to 5-FU in patients with microsatellite instability. (5) Bioinformatics analyses revealed that DPD was enriched in immune-related functions and pathways such as activation of T cells and macrophages. DPD plays an important role in the immune microenvironment and drug resistance of colon cancers and their functional association.

Precision fluoropyrimidines dosing in a compound heterozygous variant carrier of the DPYD gene: a case report.

Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) form still nowadays the backbone of chemotherapic schemes in colorectal cancer (CRC). Inter-patient variability of the toxicity profile of FPs may be partially accounted for by variable expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). DPD rate activity is genetically determined by its extremely polymorphic coding gene DPYD. In spite of pharmacogenetic guideline-directed-dosing of FPs based regimens treating carrier of multiple variants of DPYD gene remains still challenging. We present a case of a 48-year-old Caucasian man, compound heterozygous variant carrier of the DPYD gene (HapB3 and c.2194G>A) who had a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the left colon and was safely treated with a pharmacogenetic-guided 25% dose reduction of the standard CAP adjuvant treatment. Compound heterozygosis may have been responsible for an earlier over exposure to CAP resulting into low-grade toxicity with an anticipated median time to toxicity of the c.2194G>A variant to the 4th vs. 6th cycles. Some haplotypes of DPYD variants may have an advantage in terms of survival compared to wild-type patients. Our patient may also have benefitted from compound heterozygosis, as shown by no evidence of disease (NED) at 6-month follow-up. Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing of DPYD intermediate metabolizer compound heterozygous HapB3 and c.2194G>A variant carries should be managed by a multidisciplinary team with a dose reduction ranging from 25 to 50% to maintain effectiveness and close clinical monitoring for early detection of ADRs.

A pilot study using immunohistochemical staining to characterize dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression in keratinocyte neoplasms

To the Editor: Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat actinic keratoses (AK), superficial basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCis). 5-FU is metabolized and inactivated by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which is highly active in the liver but can be expressed in tumors as well. In several visceral malignancies, tumor DPD expression predicts response to systemic 5-FU: tumors with lower DPD expression correlate with higher 5-FU reactivity and better clinical response.1Horiguchi J. Yoshida T. Koibuchi Y. et al.DPD activity and immunohistochemical DPD expression in human breast cancer.Oncol Rep. 2004; 11: 65-72PubMed Google Scholar, 2Oi K. Makino M. Ozaki M. et al.Immunohistochemical dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression is a good prognostic indicator for patients with Dukes' C colorectal cancer.Anticancer Res. 2004; 24: 273-279PubMed Google Scholar, 3Fukuda H. Takiguchi N. Koda K. Oda K. Seike K. Miyazaki M. Thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase are related to histological effects of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary gastric cancer patients.Cancer Invest. 2006; 24: 235-241https://doi.org/10.1080/07357900600632082Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar Although this association has been studied in visceral tumors, the expression of DPD in keratinocyte neoplasms is not known. In this pilot study, we assessed DPD expression in benign, premalignant, and malignant keratinocyte neoplasms to assess the range and level of DPD activity. We performed DPD immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of 26 superficial and nodular basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 10 SCCis, 16 AKs, and 8 seborrheic keratoses from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens collected within the past 3 years. Diagnoses were confirmed by dermatopathologists (B.H., B.D.). DPD IHC was performed with anti-DPD antibody (Abcam #134922, 1:500 dilution). DPD expression was scored by intensity ranging from 0 to 3 by 2 authors (O.I. and B.D.), with hepatic staining as a positive control (Table I). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare DPD scores between classes of keratinocyte neoplasms (R software, version 4.0.3, https://www.r-project.org).Table IDihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase immunohistochemistry intensity score in patient samples (n = 60)DPD IHC intensity score0123Seborrheic keratosis0422Actinic keratosis1960SCC in situ0442Basal cell carcinoma21410Basal cell carcinoma includes both superficial and nodular subtypes. DPD IHC intensity was scored from 0 to 3 (0: no expression, 1: weak expression, 2: moderate expression, 3: strong expression). Fisher’s exact test P value = 3.95 × 10−9.DPD, Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; IHC, immunohistochemistry; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. Open table in a new tab Basal cell carcinoma includes both superficial and nodular subtypes. DPD IHC intensity was scored from 0 to 3 (0: no expression, 1: weak expression, 2: moderate expression, 3: strong expression). Fisher’s exact test P value = 3.95 × 10−9. DPD, Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; IHC, immunohistochemistry; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. The results showed a significantly enriched proportion of BCCs (81%, 21/26) displaying no DPD expression (DPD IHC intensity score of 0), compared to 0% (0/10) of SCCis and 6% (1/16) of AKs (P = 3.95 × 10−9, Table I). By contrast, 15% of BCC, 40% of SCCis, and 56% of AK had an intensity score of 1; 3% of BCC, 40% of SCCis, and 37.5% of AK had an intensity score of 2; and 0% of BCC, 20% of SCCis, and 0% of AK had an intensity score of 3 (Table I). The DPD intensity scores of seborrheic keratoses, a noncancerous keratinocyte neoplasm control, were distributed between 1 and 3. Our results suggest that DPD expression varies both within and across different keratinocyte neoplasms, and that a substantial fraction of BCC may have lower DPD expression compared to AK, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and seborrheic keratoses. Clinical studies have reported a wide range of efficacy in the use of topical 5-FU treatment for early-stage BCC and SCC, with success rates in SCC ranging from 27% to 93%.4Love W.E. Bernhard J.D. Bordeaux J. Topical imiquimod or fluorouracil therapy for basal and squamous cell carcinoma.Arch Dermatol. 2009; 145: 1431-1438Crossref PubMed Scopus (191) Google Scholar,5Neale H. Michelon M. Jacob S. et al.Topical 5% 5-fluorouracil versus procedural modalities for squamous cell carcinoma in situ and superficial basal cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022; 87: 423-425https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.045Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar While differences in treatment regimens and study design are likely to contribute to this variability, our results raise the possibility that differences in keratinocyte tumor DPD expression could also play a role in topical 5-FU treatment efficacy. The results of this pilot study support the value of a larger prospective study to investigate if DPD expression predicts clinical response of low-grade BCC and SCC to topical 5-FU. If true, then DPD IHC staining could be performed by pathology services to identify keratinocyte neoplasms that are more likely to respond favorably to topical 5-FU, reducing the uncertainty of treatment efficacy to this useful therapeutic option. None disclosed.

Effects of gene expression in 5-FU metabolic pathways in a phase III trial evaluating adjuvant S-1 therapy compared to surgery alone following curative resection for biliary tract cancer (JCOG1202A1).

732 Background: S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, is standard adjuvant therapy in Japanese patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC), based on the results of JCOG1202, a phase III trial evaluating adjuvant S-1 following curative resection for BTC compared to surgery alone. The efficacy of 5-FU-based therapy is related to the expression of enzymes involved in 5-FU metabolic pathways, such as thymidylate synthase (TS), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of the four 5-FU metabolic pathway genes on the outcomes of patients enrolled in JCOG1202. Methods: Tumor cell RNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary BTC specimens resected in 264 of 440 randomized patients in JCOG1202. The four 5-FU metabolic pathway genes were measured in 183 patients (surgery alone: n = 94; adjuvant S-1: n = 89) who were randomly divided to training (n = 96) or validation set (n = 87). The endpoints of interest were the predictive values of the four genes for the efficacy of adjuvant S-1 on overall survival and relapse-free survival (RFS), and we here report the results regarding RFS. Cut-off levels for mRNA expression were selected in the training set which minimized the bootstrap p-values (2,000 samples) of an interaction term of treatment (surgery alone or S-1) and mRNA expression in a Cox regression model. Results: There were no obvious differences in each mRNA level and clinical characteristics between surgery alone and adjuvant S-1 groups. RFS tended to be better with adjuvant S-1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.790, [95% confidence interval: 0.524-1.192]) compared to surgery alone, which was maintained in the low DPD population (HR = 0.440 [0.216-0.898] in training set and 0.748 [0.334-1.675] in validation set), in the low TP population (HR = 0.709 [0.388-1.296] and 0.602 [0.287-1.262]), and in the high OPRT population (HR = 0.520 [0.152-1.779] and 0.609 [0.161-2.304]). Conclusions: The efficacy of adjuvant S-1 on RFS was representative in BTC patients with intratumoral gene expressions of low DPD, low TP, and high OPRT, which was disappeared in the population with high DPD, high TP, and low OPRT. These biomarkers might be useful to predict therapeutic benefits with S-1 containing chemotherapy for BTC.

Design, synthesis, and evaluation of JTE-013 derivatives as novel potent S1PR2 antagonists for recovering the sensitivity of colorectal cancer to 5-fluorouracil

Targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2) has been proved as a promising strategy to reverse 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance. Here, we report the discovery of the novel JTE-013 derivative compound 37 h as a more effective S1PR2 antagonist to reverse 5-FU resistance in SW620/5-FU and HCT116DPD cells than JTE-013 and previously reported compound 5. Compound 37 h could effectively bind S1PR2 and reduce its expression, thus leading to decreased expression of JMJD3 and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), while also increasing the level of H3K27me3 to decrease the degradation of 5-FU and thereby increase its intracellular concentration in SW620/5-FU, HCT116DPD, and L02 cells. Furthermore, compound 37 h showed good selectivity to other S1PRs and normal colon cell line NCM460. Western blot analysis demonstrated that compound 37 h could abrogate the FBAL-stimulated upregulation of DPD expression by S1PR2. Importantly, compound 37 h also showed favorable metabolic stability with a long half-life (t1/2) of 7.9 h. Moreover, compound 37 h significantly enhanced the antitumor efficacy of 5-FU in the SW620/5-FU animal model. Thus, the JTE-013-based derivative compound 37 h represents a promising lead compound for the development of novel 5-FU sensitizers for colorectal cancer (CRC) therapy.

Rational Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel S1PR2 Antagonists for Reversing 5-FU-Resistance in Colorectal Cancer.

Resistance to 5-FU reduces its clinical efficacy for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2) has emerged as a potential target to reverse 5-FU-resistance by inhibiting the expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). In this study, 38 novel S1PR2 antagonists based on aryl urea structure were designed and synthesized, and the structure-activity relationship was investigated based on the S1PR2 binding assay. Representative compound 43 potently interacts with S1PR2 with a KD value of 0.73 nM. It displays potent 5-FU resensitizing activity in multiple 5-FU-resistant tumor cell lines, particularly in SW620/5-FU (EC50 = 1.99 ± 0.03 μM) but shows no cytotoxicity in the normal colon cell line NCM460 up to 1000 μM. Moreover, 43 significantly enhances the antitumor efficacy of 5-FU in the SW620/5-FU animal model. These data suggest that 43 could be a novel lead compound for developing a 5-FU resensitizing agent.

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase-Mediated Resistance to 5-Fluorouracil: Mechanistic Investigation and Solution.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutics for the treatment of cancers associated with the aerodigestive tract, breast, and colorectal system. The efficacy of 5-FU is majorly affected by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) as it degrades more than 80% of administered 5-FU into an inactive metabolite, dihydrofluorouracil. Herein we discuss the molecular mechanism of this inactivation by analyzing the interaction pattern and electrostatic complementarity of the DPD-5-FU complex. The basis of DPD overexpression in cancer cell lines due to significantly distinct levels of the miRNAs (miR-134, miR-27b, and miR-27a) compared to normal cells has also been outlined. Additionally, some kinases including sphingosine kinase 2 (SphK2) have been reported to correlate with DPD expression. Currently, to address this problem various strategies are reported in the literature, including 5-FU analogues (bypass the DPD-mediated inactivation), DPD downregulators (regulate the DPD expression levels in tumors), inhibitors (as promising adjuvants), and formulation development loaded with 5-FU (liposomes, nanoparticles, nanogels, etc.), which are briefly discussed in this Review.

Abstract 5420: DPYD enhancer variant confers increased risk of severe toxicity in 5-FU chemotherapy

Abstract Genetic variants in the DPYD gene that are deleterious to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme function have demonstrated clinical validity as predictive biomarkers for severe (i.e., CTCAE grade ≥3) and potentially lethal toxicity to fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine chemotherapies. Variants within the coding region only explain 5-10% of 5-FU-related toxicities; and GWAS approaches have been unable to identify validated predictive biomarkers to date. Our previous studies demonstrated that DPD expression was controlled by multiple epigenetic processes; considerable variation was also noted in liver DPYD/DPD levels. Using CRISPR-interference (CRISPRi) and CRISPR-activation (CRISPRa), we identified functional enhancer regions within liver tissues and cells. Epigenetic status at these regions was shown to correlate with DPYD expression in cell models and human liver tissues. Chromosome conformation capture (3C) confirmed direct promoter-enhancer interactions. A multi-omics analysis of &amp;gt;1000 human liver specimens identified a proximal eQTL for DPYD expression within an enhancer, with a global minor allele frequency of 27%. This variant was subsequently shown to directly alter DPYD expression in knock-in cell line models. The variant disrupts transcription factor binding at the DPYD enhancer, leading to reduced enhancer-promoter interaction, reduced DPD expression, and increased cellular sensitivity to 5-FU. Collectively, our data suggest that the variant could represent a novel predictive biomarker for severe 5-FU toxicity. The evaluation of this marker in the clinical setting is currently underway. Citation Format: Ting Zhang, Alisa Ambrodji, Huixing Huang, Kelly Bouchonville, Amy Etheridge, Remington Schmidt, Jose Cardiel Nunez, Zoey Temesgen, Federico Innocenti, Robert Diasio, Carlo Largiadèr, Steven M. Offer. DPYD enhancer variant confers increased risk of severe toxicity in 5-FU chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5420.

Importance of Rare DPYD Genetic Polymorphisms for 5-Fluorouracil Therapy in the Japanese Population.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the DPYD gene, is the rate-limiting enzyme in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) degradation. In Caucasians, four DPYD risk variants are recognized to be responsible for interindividual variations in the development of 5-FU toxicity. However, these risk variants have not been identified in Asian populations. Recently, 41 DPYD allelic variants, including 15 novel single nucleotide variants, were identified in 3,554 Japanese individuals by analyzing their whole-genome sequences; however, the effects of these variants on DPD enzymatic activity remain unknown. In the present study, an in vitro analysis was performed on 41 DPD allelic variants and three DPD risk variants to elucidate the changes in enzymatic activity. Wild-type and 44 DPD-variant proteins were heterologously expressed in 293FT cells. DPD expression levels and dimerization of DPD were determined by immunoblotting after SDS-PAGE and blue native PAGE, respectively. The enzymatic activity of DPD was evaluated by quantification of dihydro-5-FU, a metabolite of 5-FU, using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Moreover, we used 3D simulation modeling to analyze the effect of amino acid substitutions on the conformation of DPD. Among the 41 DPD variants, seven exhibited drastically decreased intrinsic clearance (CL int ) compared to the wild-type protein. Moreover, R353C and G926V exhibited no enzymatic activity, and the band patterns observed in the immunoblots after blue native PAGE indicated that DPD dimerization is required for its enzymatic activity. Our data suggest that these variants may contribute to the significant inter-individual variability observed in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 5-FU. In our study, nine DPD variants exhibited drastically decreased or no enzymatic activity due to dimerization inhibition or conformational changes in each domain. Especially, the rare DPYD variants, although at very low frequencies, may serve as important pharmacogenomic markers associated with the severe 5-FU toxicity in Japanese population.

Cancer genomic profiling identified dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency in bladder cancer promotes sensitivity to gemcitabine

Chemotherapy is a standard therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, genomic alterations associated with chemotherapy sensitivity in MIBC have not been fully explored. This study aimed to investigate the genomic landscape of MIBC in association with the response to chemotherapy and to explore the biological role of genomic alterations. Genomic alterations in MIBC were sequenced by targeted exome sequencing of 409 genes. Gene expression in MIBC tissues was analyzed by western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and RNA microarray. Cellular sensitivity to gemcitabine and gemcitabine metabolite was examined in bladder cancer cells after modulation of candidate gene. Targeted exome sequencing in 20 cases with MIBC revealed various genomic alterations including pathogenic missense mutation of DPYD gene encoding dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Conversely, high DPYD and DPD expression were associated with poor response to gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy among patients with MIBC, as well as gemcitabine resistance in bladder cancer cells. DPD suppression rendered cells sensitive to gemcitabine, while DPD overexpression made cells gemcitabine-resistant through reduced activity of the cytotoxic gemcitabine metabolite difluorodeoxycytidine diphosphate. This study revealed the novel role of DPD in gemcitabine metabolism. It has been suggested that DPYD genomic alterations and DPD expression are potential predictive biomarkers in gemcitabine treatment.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 antagonists as potent 5-FU-resistance reversal agents for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and its prodrugs are the essential clinical drugs for colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. However, the drug resistance of 5-FU has caused high mortality of CRC patients. Thus, it is urgent to develop reversal agents of 5-FU resistance. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2) was proved to be a potential target for reversing 5-FU resistance, but the activity of known S1PR2 antagonists JTE-013 were weak in 5-FU-resistant cell lines. To develop more potent S1PR2 antagonists to treat 5-FU-resistant cancer, a series of JTE-013 derivatives were designed and synthesized. The most promising compound 40 could markedly reverse the resistance in 5-FU-resistant HCT116cells and 5-FU-resistant SW620cells via inhibiting the expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The key was that compound 40 with improved pharmacokinetic properties significantly increased the inhibitory rate of 5-FU in the SW620/5-FU cells xenograft model with no observable toxicity by inhibiting the expression of DPD in tumor and liver tissues. Altogether, these results suggest that compound 40 may be a promising drug candidate to reverse 5-FU resistance in the treatment of CRC.

Novel 5-fluorouracil sensitizers for colorectal cancer therapy: Design and synthesis of S1P receptor 2 (S1PR2) antagonists

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2) has been identified as a brand-new GPCR target for designing antagonists to reverse 5-FU resistance. We herein report the structural optimization and structure-activity relationship of JTE-013 derivatives as S1PR2 antagonists. Compound 9d was the most potent S1PR2 antagonist (KD = 34.8 nM) among developed compounds. Here, compound 9d could significantly inhibit the expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) to reverse 5-FU-resistance in HCT116DPD and SW620/5-FU cells. Further mechanism studies demonstrated that compound 9d not only inhibited S1PR2 but also affected the transcription of S1PR2. In addition, compound 9d also showed acceptable selectivity to normal cells (NCM460). Importantly, compound 9d with suitable pharmacokinetic properties could significantly reverse 5-FU-resistance in the HCT116DPD and SW620/5-FU xenograft models without obvious toxicity, in which the inhibition rates of 5-FU were increased from 23.97% to 65.29% and 27.23% to 60.81%, respectively. Further immunohistochemistry and western blotting analysis also demonstrated that compound 9d significantly decreases the expression of DPD in tumor and liver tissues. These results indicated that compound 9d is a promising lead compound to reverse 5-FU-resistance for colorectal cancer therapy.

Hypoxia Drives Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression in Macrophages and Confers Chemoresistance in Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of death worldwide, and immune infiltration in colorectal tumors has been recognized recently as an important pathophysiologic event. In this context, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) have been related to chemoresistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the first-line chemotherapeutic agent used in treating colorectal cancers. Nevertheless, the details of this chemoresistance mechanism are still poorly elucidated. In the current study, we report that macrophages specifically overexpress dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in hypoxia, leading to macrophage-induced chemoresistance to 5-FU via inactivation of the drug. Hypoxia-induced macrophage DPD expression was controlled by HIF2α. TAMs constituted the main contributors to DPD activity in human colorectal primary or secondary tumors, while cancer cells did not express significant levels of DPD. In addition, contrary to humans, macrophages in mice do not express DPD. Together, these findings shed light on the role of TAMs in promoting chemoresistance in colorectal cancers and identify potential new therapeutic targets. SIGNIFICANCE: Hypoxia induces HIF2α-mediated overexpression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in TAMs, leading to chemoresistance to 5-FU in colon cancers.

DPYD, down-regulated by the potentially chemopreventive agent luteolin, interacts with STAT3 in pancreatic cancer

The 5-year survival rate of pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) patients is <10% despite progress in clinical medicine. Strategies to prevent the development of PDAC are urgently required. The flavonoids Luteolin (Lut) and hesperetin (Hes) may be cancer-chemopreventive, but effects on pancreatic carcinogenesis in vivo have not been studied. Here, the chemopreventive effects of Lut and Hes on pancreatic carcinogenesis are assessed in the BOP-induced hamster PDAC model. Lut but not Hes suppressed proliferation of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) and reduced the incidence and multiplicity of PDAC in this model. Lut also inhibited the proliferation of hamster and human pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Multi-blot and microarray assays revealed decreased phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) on Lut exposure. To explore the relationship between DPYD and STAT3 activity, the former was silenced by RNAi or overexpressed using expression vectors, and the latter was inactivated by small molecule inhibitors or stimulated by IL6 in human PDAC cells. DPYD knock-down decreased, and overexpression increased, pSTAT3 and cell proliferation. DPYD expression was decreased by inactivation of STAT3 and increased by its activation. The frequency of pSTAT3-positive cells and DPYD expression was significantly correlated and was decreased in parallel by Lut in the hamster PDAC model. Finally, immunohistochemical analysis in 73 cases of human PDAC demonstrated that DPYD expression was positively correlated with the Ki-67 labeling index, and high expression was associated with poor prognosis. These results indicate that Lut is a promising chemopreventive agent for PDAC, targeting a novel STAT3-DPYD pathway.

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and MicroRNAs in Colorectal Cancer Chemoresistance to FOLFOX.

The FOLFOX scheme, based on the association of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, is the most frequently indicated chemotherapy scheme for patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, development of chemoresistance is one of the major challenges associated with this disease. It has been reported that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is implicated in microRNA-driven modulation of tumor cells response to 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin. Moreover, from pharmacogenomic research, it is known that overexpression of genes encoding dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), thymidylate synthase (TYMS), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), the DNA repair enzymes ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC1, and the phase 2 enzyme GSTP1 impair the response to FOLFOX. It has been observed that EMT is associated with overexpression of DPYD, TYMS, ERCC1, and GSTP1. In this review, we investigated the role of miRNAs as EMT promotors in tumor cells, and its potential effect on the upregulation of DPYD, TYMS, MTHFR, ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1, and GSTP1 expression, which would lead to resistance of CRC tumor cells to 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin. This constitutes a potential mechanism of epigenetic regulation involved in late-onset of acquired resistance in mCRC patients under FOLFOX chemotherapy. Expression of these biomarker microRNAs could serve as tools for personalized medicine, and as potential therapeutic targets in the future.